Well-Being
 

Could "The Pill" be Harmless?

764px-Plaquettes_de_pilule.jpgIt probably goes without saying that I've never taken birth control pills. But I've dated women who have, and they often talked about their potential side effects and the dangers of staying on them for too long. Their OB/GYNs recommended that they take periodic breaks from the pill to avoid causing irreparable damage to their reproductive systems, and to allow their bodies to regain some natural balance.


But is that wisdom outdated? Some sources suggest that breaks from birth control pills are unnecessary, and according to a 40-year-long study in England, women who take the pill are less likely to die from any cause, including heart disease and cancer.


The study began in 1968, when the pills being prescribed to subjects were different than those used today, giving the results a margin of error worth noting. The scientists behind the study say that older women who took the pill during the 70s and 80s can take comfort in the findings, while the effects of newer forms are difficult to gauge.


This may also be one of those misleading studies that fails to acknowledge that women who take the pill may, on average, be more health conscious in general, and therefore more likely to take care of themselves overall, reducing their chances of developing illness.


As with most medical studies, this one is bound to be challenged by other doctors and some women who take the pill. And regardless of whether they take the pill or not, women should educate themselves about their reproductive cycles. But it does give us something to think about.


[Image: Ceridwen from Wikimedia Commons]

 

Running for Jenny

jennycrain.jpgAs a runner, I'm surprised (and somewhat embarrassed) that for the past two and a half years I've managed to miss the news about Jenny Crain, a once-competitive runner and Olympic hopeful who was struck by a car in August of 2007, ending her running career but not her life -- barely.


This weekend, I stumbled across an article about Crain in last November's Runner's World , and I was riveted by her tale of loss, perseverance, and survival. At 39, Crain had the kind of running résumé that most runners can only dream of. But on a routine training run in downtown Milwaukee, where she lived, she got hit by the side of a car moving 30mph, sending Crain flying and fracturing her vertebrae, crushing part of her skull, and causing severe brain damage.


Now, Crain lives in a wheelchair and is under constant care. Ironically, her story is the sort that made me become a runner in the first place: to do what so many people wish they could do but can't, either because of physical defects, disease, or debilitating injury.


But I always pictured those who could never run as my inspiration, not a world-class athlete and four-time Olympic Trials qualifier. Just now returning to my sport of choice after a two-month hiatus due to injury myself, I was already grateful to just be able to logging miles again. After learning about Crain, I am both humbled and inspired to make 2010 my best year yet.



[Image: RunnersCookBook.com]

 

"The Cove" Team Comes to America

09sushi_CA0-articleInline.jpgIf you saw The Cove, which won this year's Academy Award for best documentary, you're probably glad you're not at student at a Japanese grammar school. In certain parts of that country, dolphin meat is served to children, falsely identified as whale meat. Adults, too, are often served dolphin when they order whale, a staple especially in fishing communities in Coastal Japan.


Now, the filmmakers have set their sights on sushi restaurants in the U.S., namely one in California that was rumored to be serving whale meat, which is illegal here. With stiff fines up to $20,000 and as much as one year in prison, most Japanese restaurants stick with the standards: California rolls, spicy tuna, eel, etc.


But at The Hump in Los Angeles, patrons who ordered "omakase" -- or "chef's choice" -- were being served a helping of whale along with their sashimi, edamame, and fish roe.


The sting operation actually began last October, but took time to execute. The State of California has promised swift action, but has not disclosed exactly what the punishment will be. "This isn't just about saving the whales," says the film's director, Louie Psihoyos. "It's about saving the planet."


[Image: NYTimes.com]

 

Barbie Gets a Job at Sterling Cooper

Mad-Men-Barbies-500x373.jpg


First Banana Republic designs a line of Draper-inspired garments, and now Mattel has announced its plans for a line of Mad Men Barbie dolls. It's clear that retailers are taking notice of AMC's Mad Men, and fans of the show should be happy about that, right?


Well, these new vintage-style Barbie dolls, which will be available this summer in conjunction with the season four premiere of the show, might be fun for doll collectors (and since they'll retail for $74.95 each you'll need to be a collector to justify buying one) but they leave something to be desired for die-hard Sterling Cooper devotees.


For starters, the Joan Holloway doll is lacking anything even remotely resembling the lovely curves that have made Christina Hendricks (the actor who portrays her) a household name. One of the great things about Mad Men is its body diversity (at least for a television show) and it's a shame that Barbie, a doll known for her unrealistic proportions, couldn't break the mold in this case and make a doll that reflected the woman who inspired her creation.


Another great thing about Mad Men (can you tell I'm a fan?) is the character development. Over three seasons, we've watched main character Peggy Olson transform from an insecure secretary to a take-no-prisoners adwoman. So where is the Peggy doll? Again, because Peggy's physique (she is thin and without Barbie's Amazonian assets) is outside of the norm, I have to guess that, rather than rework Barbie, Mattel decided they'd leave Peggy out of the lineup. For shame!


OK, so some of this television-show-based-doll discussion is a bit frivolous, but a line of homogeneous-looking dolls like this does send a subtle message to the public. It's just that it is a very different message than the one sent by many of the characters on Mad Men who represent a variety of physical types, whose very presence on such a popular show goes a long way when it comes to body acceptance.


Also, $74.95 per doll? That's outrageous!


[Image: Pop Crunch]

 

Howard Stern Vs. Gabourey Sidibe


Radio shock jock Howard Stern once again put his foot in it this week. Full disclosure: I have been a fan of the locker room conversational tone of the show and its often brutal honesty for over 20 years. (Though it is not inconceivable that my enduring loyalty of the show has more to do with the fact that I got into the habit of listening daily as a hormonal teenager.) This recent frisson is yet another instance where Howard Stern and I don't agree on an issue. The morning after Academy Award nominee Gabourey Sidibe lost her bid for Best Actress, the Stern show laid it on savagely. From CNN:


During Howard Stern's Sirius satellite show on Monday morning, co-host Robin Quivers commented that Sidibe should have looked around at the Oscars and noticed that none of the other working actresses looked like her.


"What movie could she play in?" Stern questioned on his live broadcast. "You feel bad because everyone pretends that she's part of show business, and she's never going to be in another movie."


Worse, in a beyond-the-pale provocative manner, Stern called the Oscar nominated actress a "fat black chick." Disgusting. Unpardonable, even. And misinformed, since Sidibe has two movie roles and a television role in the works. Still, the question arises: Can talent outweigh size in Hollywood? Could someone as talented and pure of heart but unconventionally attractive as Sibide is build a career in a town so comically shallow?


The effects of Howard Stern's comments have, you can imagine, alighted the blogosphere something ferocious. Hollywood-Elsewhere, for example, calls the comments "needlessly cruel" (they were), adding, "Stern isn't wrong in saying that her prospects are limited." The question as to whether or not an actress of Gabourey Sidibe's size could find work in Hollywood briefly came up when Vanity Fair very publicly -- and controversially -- passed her over for their cover of "Young Hollywood." Stern, for his part, has sort of backtracked -- saying that he made those comments out of concern for Sidibe's weight. What do you think?

 

Corey Haim, as We'll Remember Him

As a child of the late '70s and early '80s, I can't deny a soft spot in my heart for the "two Coreys": Feldman and Haim. So it was a genuine shock for me when I learned Wednesday of Corey Haim's death at age 38, presumably from an overdose of prescription drugs.


But as with Heath Ledger, Brittany Murphy, and Michael Jackson, we'll remember Haim not for his sad, untimely death, but for his public persona, and the characters he played in movies like Lucas, The Lost Boys, and License to Drive. Let's take a look at Haim at age 15 in Lucas, just two years before the actor said he tried pot for the first time, on the set of The Lost Boys. Before long, he was on cocaine, then crack, and then meds. Hard to believe watching this gem from 1986.


 

The Autusm Vaccine Debate Continues


Despite the fact that The Lancet, that most respectable of medical journals, recently retracted Andrew Wakefield's 1998 study that first linked the MMR vaccine to autism, high-profile celebrities and a growing movement of parents have taken to the media to argue that there is a causal link. Jenny McCarthy talked to The Huffington Post, saying, in part:


With so many kids with autism, the environment has to be to blame, and vaccines are an obvious culprit. Almost all kids get vaccines -- injected toxins -- very early in life, and our own government clearly acknowledges vaccines cause brain damage in certain vulnerable kids.


Take those simple facts, along with tens of thousands of parental reports of regression after vaccination, not to mention a growing list of court cases where our government paid claims to children with autism acknowledging vaccines as the trigger, and the case we Moms are making makes sense.


McCarthy is not alone. Doug Flutie and Toni Braxton agree. Curiously, according to Arthur Allen, the author of "Vaccine: The Controversial Story of Medicine's Greatest Lifesaver,'' urbane locales that you wouldn't expect like Berkeley, California and Boulder, Colorado have the country's lowest vaccination rates. "It's sort of where the intellectual hippies meet the black helicopter crowd,'' said Allen. So the fears of vaccination go deeper than a lack of trust in science.


A startling 25% of parents think -- despite medical evidence to the contrary -- that some vaccines cause autism in healthy children. Celebrities may not have medical training but they are highly visible and media-savvy. If a quarter of parents believe this, it might be time to find some common ground between the parents -- who are naturally highly anxious about their newborns -- and the science, which, quite frankly, just did a flip-flop.

 

Google Maps Adds Cycling Routes!

09gadgetwise-custom4.jpg


Cyclists of the world, rejoice! After years of asking, petitioning, and finger crossing, Google Maps has added a bicycling map option.


Later this afternoon, at the 10th Annual Bike Summit in Washington, D.C., the folks at Google Maps will announce the finer points of the new program, as well as the 150 cities in which it will first be made available. Though a few cities have had independently-produced interactive cycling map access for awhile now (my hometown of Portland, OR being one) the Google Bicycling Maps is further reaching and offers more handy features than its predecessors.


For instance, similarly to the driving and walking directions on Google Maps, once you type in your starting point and your desired destination, the service selects a route and provide estimated cycling times. Bicycling Maps gives you several options for your route, even steers you away from freeways and busy streets and toward bike lanes. Not only that, the program even helps you avoid hills -- great news if you're a complete incline-a-phobe like me. (Of course, if you aren't, you can always program your route to include hills. I wouldn't recommend it though.)


We can assume the hope for this new Google Maps function is not only that already active cyclists will find it useful, but that it will encourage more people to hang up the car keys and grab that bike helmet. I have to admit that if it helps me avoid those hills as promised, I might have to start traveling on two wheels instead of four. What do you think?


[Image: Gadgetwise Blog -- NY Times]

 

Could The Soda Tax Curb Childhood Obesity?



The CARDIA study released on Monday suggests that "policies aimed at altering the price of soda or away-from-home pizza may be effective mechanisms to steer US adults toward a more healthful diet and help reduce long-term weight gain or insulin levels over time." And in this moment of exigency where state budgets are billions of dollars in shortfall, why not consider taxing soda to promote wellness?


The advocacy of former President Bill Clinton -- who has wrestled with his relationship with food all his life -- and a growing movement to tax sugary drinks is resulting in ground gained in the battle to reduce childhood obesity. "I have to admit I'm stunned by the results," Bill Clinton said. "There has been an 88 percent reduction in the total beveraged calories shipped to schools." This, after the Clinton Initiative is half way into its ten-year plan to get beverage companies to reduce the sugar in the drinks they serve in school cafeterias.


Sugary drink taxes are probably now an idea whose time has come. Colorado and Illinois are already taxing the drinks. My colleague David Alm recently wrote about Governor David Patterson's attempt to impose a penny per ounce tax on sweetened beverages passed through the New York state legislature. Three quarters of New Yorkers recently polled are for such a tax. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has been at the forefront of such a plan, has estimated that such a tax could potentially raise a billion dollars.


The First Lady has also gotten in on the action. Aside from her important work with military families, Michelle Obama -- she of the White House victory garden and the magnificently toned arms -- recently took to the Huckabee Show on Fox to speak on the prevention of childhood obesity. Former Governor Huckabee, though on the other side of the political spectrum from the Obamas, suffers from type-II diabetes and, like fellow Arkansan Bill Clinton, has wrestled with his weight all his life. Promoting healthy habits for our kids (and ourselves) is an issue we can all agree upon, even in these hyper-partisan times.

 

Study: Women, Wine, and Weight

While at the gym yesterday, I noticed a news headline on one of the televisions exclaim that women who drink alcohol gain less weight than those of us who don't. Say what? I practically fell off the treadmill (a machine I was on in part to burn calories from drinking alcohol over the weekend) in surprise. As a woman, this goes against just about everything I've ever been told about drinking, that I should watch my alcohol intake unless I want to put on pounds (something men are rarely told, but that's for a different blog post). Could it be true?


A new study from Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital tells us that yes, it could be. The results (gathered over 13 years from a sample of nearly 20,000 women) show that the risk of becoming overweight or obese decreases as alcohol consumption increases, even when factors such as smoking, fruit and vegetable consumption, and physical activity are taken into account. The full results of the study can be found in the latest Archives of Internal Medicine.


Now this may be good news for those of us who like to drink on occasion, but there's no reason to go hitting the bottle just yet. "It won't change recommendations for my patients, I can say that for certain," Scott Kahan, M.D., the co-director of the George Washington University Weight Management Program, in Washington, D.C. told CNN. "If you don't drink, there's no reason to start."


But, he adds, "I think [the study] suggests that there's no need to quit or avoid alcohol if it's something you enjoy."


CBS News had a similar message for their Early Show viewers yesterday:



OK, so I won't be investing in a new wine cellar anytime soon, and I probably shouldn't cancel that gym membership. Still, in an era where we're told more often than not that the foods and drinks we enjoy are slowly killing us, it's nice to get some good news. Now, pass the wine please.